SCHNEBLE v. FLORIDA,
392 U.S. 298 (1968)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
SCHNEBLE v. FLORIDA, 392 U.S. 298 (1968)
392 U.S. 298 SCHNEBLE ET AL. v. FLORIDA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 1070, Misc.
Decided June 10, 1968.
Certiorari granted; 201 So.2d 881, vacated and remanded.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).
U.S. Supreme Court
BOGART v. CALIFORNIA, 392 U.S. 298 (1968)
392 U.S. 298 BOGART v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 1221, Misc.
Decided June 10, 1968.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Peter D. Bogart for petitioner.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
