BRANIGIN v. DUDDLESTON, 391 U.S. 364 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

BRANIGIN v. DUDDLESTON, 391 U.S. 364 (1968)

391 U.S. 364

BRANIGIN ET AL. v. DUDDLESTON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 1252.
Decided May 20, 1968.*

284 F. Supp. 176, affirmed.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 1263, Summers v. Duddleston et al., also on appeal from the same court.

John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, and Charles S. White for appellants in No. 1252. Marshall F. Kizer for appellant in No. 1263.

Leslie Duvall and William H. Sparrenberger for appellees in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, for reasons contained in his memorandum of March 4, 1968 (390 U.S. 932, sub nom. Branigin v. Grills), in which he acquiesced in the denial of stays of enforcement of the District Court's judgment, also acquiesces in the Court's affirmance of that judgment.

Page 391 U.S. 364, 365




U.S. Supreme Court

BRANIGIN v. DUDDLESTON, 391 U.S. 364 (1968)

391 U.S. 364

BRANIGIN ET AL. v. DUDDLESTON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 1252.
Decided May 20, 1968.*

284 F. Supp. 176, affirmed.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 1263, Summers v. Duddleston et al., also on appeal from the same court.

John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, and Charles S. White for appellants in No. 1252. Marshall F. Kizer for appellant in No. 1263.

Leslie Duvall and William H. Sparrenberger for appellees in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, for reasons contained in his memorandum of March 4, 1968 (390 U.S. 932, sub nom. Branigin v. Grills), in which he acquiesced in the denial of stays of enforcement of the District Court's judgment, also acquiesces in the Court's affirmance of that judgment.

Page 391 U.S. 364, 365

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.