SIMS v. COHEN, 390 U.S. 746 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

SIMS v. COHEN, 390 U.S. 746 (1968)

390 U.S. 746

SIMS v. COHEN, ACTING SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 386, Misc.
Decided April 29, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 378 F.2d 70, reversed.

H. H. Gearinger for petitioner.

Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.

Israel Steingold for the American Trial Lawyers Association, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Hopkins v. Cohen, ante, p. 530.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE WHITE in Hopkins v. Cohen, ante, p. 535.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 390 U.S. 746, 747




U.S. Supreme Court

SIMS v. COHEN, 390 U.S. 746 (1968)

390 U.S. 746

SIMS v. COHEN, ACTING SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 386, Misc.
Decided April 29, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 378 F.2d 70, reversed.

H. H. Gearinger for petitioner.

Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.

Israel Steingold for the American Trial Lawyers Association, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Hopkins v. Cohen, ante, p. 530.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE WHITE in Hopkins v. Cohen, ante, p. 535.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 390 U.S. 746, 747

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.