SIMS v. COHEN, 390 U.S. 746 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
SIMS v. COHEN, 390 U.S. 746 (1968)
390 U.S. 746 SIMS v. COHEN, ACTING SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 386, Misc.
Decided April 29, 1968.
Certiorari granted; 378 F.2d 70, reversed.
H. H. Gearinger for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.
Israel Steingold for the American Trial Lawyers Association, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Hopkins v. Cohen, ante, p. 530.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE WHITE in Hopkins v. Cohen, ante, p. 535.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
SIMS v. COHEN, 390 U.S. 746 (1968)
390 U.S. 746 SIMS v. COHEN, ACTING SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 386, Misc.
Decided April 29, 1968.
Certiorari granted; 378 F.2d 70, reversed.
H. H. Gearinger for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall for respondent.
Israel Steingold for the American Trial Lawyers Association, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Hopkins v. Cohen, ante, p. 530.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE WHITE in Hopkins v. Cohen, ante, p. 535.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Page 390 U.S. 746, 747
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
