SCAFATI v. GREENFIELD, 390 U.S. 713 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

SCAFATI v. GREENFIELD, 390 U.S. 713 (1968) 390 U.S. 713

SCAFATI, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT v. GREENFIELD.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 1104.
Decided April 22, 1968.

 277 F. Supp. 644, affirmed.

Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, Willie J. Davis and Howard M. Miller, Assistant Attorneys General, and Richard L. Levine, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.

TILL v. NEW MEXICO, <a href="/cases/federal/us/390/713/">390 U.S. 713</a> (1968) 390 U.S. 713 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TILL v. NEW MEXICO, 390 U.S. 713 (1968) 390 U.S. 713

TILL v. NEW MEXICO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO.
No. 1189, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1968.

78 N. M. 255, 430 P.2d 752, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Gladys Towles Root for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 390 U.S. 713, 714

 


U.S. Supreme Court

SCAFATI v. GREENFIELD, 390 U.S. 713 (1968) 390 U.S. 713

SCAFATI, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT v. GREENFIELD.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 1104.
Decided April 22, 1968.

 277 F. Supp. 644, affirmed.

Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, Willie J. Davis and Howard M. Miller, Assistant Attorneys General, and Richard L. Levine, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.

TILL v. NEW MEXICO, <a href="/cases/federal/us/390/713/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/390/713/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/390/713/">390 U.S. 713</a></a></a> (1968) 390 U.S. 713 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TILL v. NEW MEXICO, 390 U.S. 713 (1968) 390 U.S. 713

TILL v. NEW MEXICO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO.
No. 1189, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1968.

78 N. M. 255, 430 P.2d 752, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Gladys Towles Root for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 390 U.S. 713, 714

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.