HASWELL v. POWELL, 390 U.S. 712 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
HASWELL v. POWELL, 390 U.S. 712 (1968) 390 U.S. 712 HASWELL v. POWELL, SECRETARY OF STATE OF ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1055.
Decided April 22, 1968.
38 Ill. 2d 161, 230 N.E.2d 178, appeal dismissed.
John C. Tucker for appellant.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and John J. O'Toole and Robert F. Nix, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
TIMES MIRROR CO. v. UNITED STATES, 390 U.S. 712 (1968) 390 U.S. 712 TIMES MIRROR CO. v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA. No. 1162.
Decided April 22, 1968.
274 F. Supp. 606, affirmed.
Julian O. von Kalinowski for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner and Bernard M. Hollander for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.
U.S. Supreme Court
HASWELL v. POWELL, 390 U.S. 712 (1968) 390 U.S. 712 HASWELL v. POWELL, SECRETARY OF STATE OF ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1055.
Decided April 22, 1968.
38 Ill. 2d 161, 230 N.E.2d 178, appeal dismissed.
John C. Tucker for appellant.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and John J. O'Toole and Robert F. Nix, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
TIMES MIRROR CO. v. UNITED STATES, 390 U.S. 712 (1968) 390 U.S. 712 TIMES MIRROR CO. v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA. No. 1162.
Decided April 22, 1968.
274 F. Supp. 606, affirmed.
Julian O. von Kalinowski for appellant.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner and Bernard M. Hollander for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.
Page 390 U.S. 712, 713
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
