BERTERA'S HOPEWELL FOODLAND, INC. v. MASTERS, 390 U.S. 597 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
BERTERA'S HOPEWELL FOODLAND, INC. v. MASTERS, 390 U.S. 597 (1968) 390 U.S. 597 BERTERA'S HOPEWELL FOODLAND, INC. v. MASTERS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 1132.
Decided April 8, 1968.
428 Pa. 20, 236 A.2d 197, appeal dismissed.
Hubert I. Teitelbaum and Martin M. Sheinman for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
INC. VILLAGE, P. JEFFERSON v. BD. OF SUPERS., SUFFOLK, 390 U.S. 597 (1968) 390 U.S. 597 INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF PORT JEFFERSON ET AL. v. BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 1152.
Decided April 8, 1968.
Appeal dismissed.
William M. Johnson for appellants.
Stanley S. Corwin for Board of Supervisors of Suffolk County et al., and Frederick Mars for Receiver of Taxes of the Town of Brookhaven, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
BERTERA'S HOPEWELL FOODLAND, INC. v. MASTERS, 390 U.S. 597 (1968) 390 U.S. 597 BERTERA'S HOPEWELL FOODLAND, INC. v. MASTERS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 1132.
Decided April 8, 1968.
428 Pa. 20, 236 A.2d 197, appeal dismissed.
Hubert I. Teitelbaum and Martin M. Sheinman for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
INC. VILLAGE, P. JEFFERSON v. BD. OF SUPERS., SUFFOLK, 390 U.S. 597 (1968) 390 U.S. 597 INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF PORT JEFFERSON ET AL. v. BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 1152.
Decided April 8, 1968.
Appeal dismissed.
William M. Johnson for appellants.
Stanley S. Corwin for Board of Supervisors of Suffolk County et al., and Frederick Mars for Receiver of Taxes of the Town of Brookhaven, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 390 U.S. 597, 598
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
