REED ENTERPRISES v. CLARK, 390 U.S. 457 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
REED ENTERPRISES v. CLARK, 390 U.S. 457 (1968) 390 U.S. 457 REED ENTERPRISES ET AL. v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 1092.
Decided March 25, 1968.
278 F. Supp. 372, affirmed.
Stanley Fleishman, David Rein and Sam Rosenwein for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN, 390 U.S. 457 (1968) 390 U.S. 457 ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 1163, Misc.
Decided March 25, 1968.
Appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
REED ENTERPRISES v. CLARK, 390 U.S. 457 (1968) 390 U.S. 457 REED ENTERPRISES ET AL. v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 1092.
Decided March 25, 1968.
278 F. Supp. 372, affirmed.
Stanley Fleishman, David Rein and Sam Rosenwein for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN, 390 U.S. 457 (1968) 390 U.S. 457 ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 1163, Misc.
Decided March 25, 1968.
Appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 390 U.S. 457, 458
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
