REED ENTERPRISES v. CLARK, 390 U.S. 457 (1968)
REED ENTERPRISES ET AL. v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL. U.S. Supreme Court
REED ENTERPRISES v. CLARK, 390 U.S. 457 (1968) 390 U.S. 457
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 1092.
Decided March 25, 1968.
278 F. Supp. 372, affirmed.
Stanley Fleishman, David Rein and Sam Rosenwein for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN, 390 U.S. 457 (1968) 390 U.S. 457 ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 1163, Misc.
Decided March 25, 1968.
Appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
REED ENTERPRISES v. CLARK, 390 U.S. 457 (1968) 390 U.S. 457 REED ENTERPRISES ET AL. v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 1092.
Decided March 25, 1968.
278 F. Supp. 372, affirmed.
Stanley Fleishman, David Rein and Sam Rosenwein for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN, 390 U.S. 457 (1968) 390 U.S. 457 ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 1163, Misc.
Decided March 25, 1968.
Appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 390 U.S. 457, 458
