REED ENTERPRISES v. CLARK, 390 U.S. 457 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

REED ENTERPRISES v. CLARK, 390 U.S. 457 (1968) 390 U.S. 457

REED ENTERPRISES ET AL. v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 1092.
Decided March 25, 1968.

 278 F. Supp. 372, affirmed.

Stanley Fleishman, David Rein and Sam Rosenwein for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/390/457/">390 U.S. 457</a> (1968) 390 U.S. 457 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN, 390 U.S. 457 (1968) 390 U.S. 457

ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 1163, Misc.
Decided March 25, 1968.

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 390 U.S. 457, 458

 


U.S. Supreme Court

REED ENTERPRISES v. CLARK, 390 U.S. 457 (1968) 390 U.S. 457

REED ENTERPRISES ET AL. v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 1092.
Decided March 25, 1968.

 278 F. Supp. 372, affirmed.

Stanley Fleishman, David Rein and Sam Rosenwein for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/390/457/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/390/457/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/390/457/">390 U.S. 457</a></a></a> (1968) 390 U.S. 457 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN, 390 U.S. 457 (1968) 390 U.S. 457

ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 1163, Misc.
Decided March 25, 1968.

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 390 U.S. 457, 458

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.