ANDERSON v. JOHNSON, 390 U.S. 456 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
ANDERSON v. JOHNSON, 390 U.S. 456 (1968)
390 U.S. 456 ANDERSON v. JOHNSON, WARDEN.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 700.
Argued March 6, 1968.
Decided March 25, 1968.
371 F.2d 84, judgment remains in effect.
J. Brad Reed argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Ed R. Davies argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee.
PER CURIAM.
Four members of the Court would reverse. Four members of the Court would dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. Consequently, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit remains in effect.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
ANDERSON v. JOHNSON, 390 U.S. 456 (1968)
390 U.S. 456 ANDERSON v. JOHNSON, WARDEN.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 700.
Argued March 6, 1968.
Decided March 25, 1968.
371 F.2d 84, judgment remains in effect.
J. Brad Reed argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Ed R. Davies argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee.
PER CURIAM.
Four members of the Court would reverse. Four members of the Court would dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. Consequently, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit remains in effect.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
