KNIGHT v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIV., STATE, NEW YORK, 390 U.S. 36 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

KNIGHT v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIV., STATE, NEW YORK, 390 U.S. 36 (1968) 390 U.S. 36

KNIGHT ET AL. v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE
OF NEW YORK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 826.
Decided January 22, 1968.

 269 F. Supp. 339, affirmed.

Alan H. Levine and Jeremiah S. Gutman for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. La Torella, Jr., and Maria L. Marcus, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

PAULAITIS v. PAULAITIS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/390/36/">390 U.S. 36</a> (1968) 390 U.S. 36 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PAULAITIS v. PAULAITIS, 390 U.S. 36 (1968) 390 U.S. 36

PAULAITIS v. PAULAITIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 815.
Decided January 22, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 390 U.S. 36, 37

 


U.S. Supreme Court

KNIGHT v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIV., STATE, NEW YORK, 390 U.S. 36 (1968) 390 U.S. 36

KNIGHT ET AL. v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE
OF NEW YORK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 826.
Decided January 22, 1968.

 269 F. Supp. 339, affirmed.

Alan H. Levine and Jeremiah S. Gutman for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. La Torella, Jr., and Maria L. Marcus, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

PAULAITIS v. PAULAITIS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/390/36/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/390/36/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/390/36/">390 U.S. 36</a></a></a> (1968) 390 U.S. 36 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PAULAITIS v. PAULAITIS, 390 U.S. 36 (1968) 390 U.S. 36

PAULAITIS v. PAULAITIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 815.
Decided January 22, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 390 U.S. 36, 37

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.