WISEMAN v. BARBY, 390 U.S. 339 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

WISEMAN v. BARBY, 390 U.S. 339 (1968)

390 U.S. 339

WISEMAN, DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA v. BARBY
ET UX.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 871.
Decided March 11, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 380 F.2d 121, reversed.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Harris Weinstein and Grant W. Wiprud for petitioner.

John K. Speck for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc., 356 U.S. 260.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted and the case set down for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.

Page 390 U.S. 339, 340

 


U.S. Supreme Court

WISEMAN v. BARBY, 390 U.S. 339 (1968)

390 U.S. 339

WISEMAN, DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA v. BARBY
ET UX.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 871.
Decided March 11, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 380 F.2d 121, reversed.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Harris Weinstein and Grant W. Wiprud for petitioner.

John K. Speck for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc., 356 U.S. 260.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted and the case set down for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.

Page 390 U.S. 339, 340

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.