LEE v. KANSAS CITY, 390 U.S. 197 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
LEE v. KANSAS CITY, 390 U.S. 197 (1968)
390 U.S. 197 LEE v. KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 383.
Decided March 4, 1968.
414 S. W. 2d 251, vacated and remanded.
Michael J. Drape for appellant.
Jack L. Simms for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Missouri is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in the light of Marchetti v. United States, ante, p. 39.
U.S. Supreme Court
WYNN v. BYRNE, 390 U.S. 197 (1968)
390 U.S. 197 WYNN ET AL. v. BYRNE, COUNTY PROSECUTOR.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 977.
Decided March 4, 1968.
Vacated and remanded.
Robert L. Carter, Martin Garbus and Morton Stavis for appellants.
Thomas P. Ford, Jr., for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey is vacated and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U.S. 97, at 104.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK would affirm the judgment.
U.S. Supreme Court
LEE v. KANSAS CITY, 390 U.S. 197 (1968)
390 U.S. 197 LEE v. KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 383.
Decided March 4, 1968.
414 S. W. 2d 251, vacated and remanded.
Michael J. Drape for appellant.
Jack L. Simms for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Missouri is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in the light of Marchetti v. United States, ante, p. 39.
U.S. Supreme Court
WYNN v. BYRNE, 390 U.S. 197 (1968)
390 U.S. 197 WYNN ET AL. v. BYRNE, COUNTY PROSECUTOR.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 977.
Decided March 4, 1968.
Vacated and remanded.
Robert L. Carter, Martin Garbus and Morton Stavis for appellants.
Thomas P. Ford, Jr., for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey is vacated and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U.S. 97, at 104.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK would affirm the judgment.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
