RAINWATER v. FLORIDA, 390 U.S. 196 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

RAINWATER v. FLORIDA, 390 U.S. 196 (1968) 390 U.S. 196

RAINWATER ET AL. v. FLORIDA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF
FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT. No. 18.
Decided March 4, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 186 So. 2d 278, vacated and remanded.

Alfred L. Scanlan and J. Edward Worton for petitioners.

Solicitor General Marshall filed a memorandum for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the court below is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in the light of Marchetti v. United States, ante, p. 39. Cf. Hoffa v. United States, 387 U.S. 231; Kolod v. United States, ante, p. 136.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

ROBERTS v. WARDEN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/390/196/case.html">390 U.S. 196</a> (1968) 390 U.S. 196 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ROBERTS v. WARDEN, 390 U.S. 196 (1968) 390 U.S. 196

ROBERTS v. WARDEN, MARYLAND PENITENTIARY.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.
No. 950, Misc.
Decided March 4, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 390 U.S. 196, 197

 


U.S. Supreme Court

RAINWATER v. FLORIDA, 390 U.S. 196 (1968) 390 U.S. 196

RAINWATER ET AL. v. FLORIDA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF
FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT. No. 18.
Decided March 4, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 186 So. 2d 278, vacated and remanded.

Alfred L. Scanlan and J. Edward Worton for petitioners.

Solicitor General Marshall filed a memorandum for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the court below is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in the light of Marchetti v. United States, ante, p. 39. Cf. Hoffa v. United States, 387 U.S. 231; Kolod v. United States, ante, p. 136.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

ROBERTS v. WARDEN, <a href="/cases/federal/us/390/196/case.html"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/390/196/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/390/196/">390 U.S. 196</a></a></a> (1968) 390 U.S. 196 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ROBERTS v. WARDEN, 390 U.S. 196 (1968) 390 U.S. 196

ROBERTS v. WARDEN, MARYLAND PENITENTIARY.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.
No. 950, Misc.
Decided March 4, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 390 U.S. 196, 197

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.