GARAFOLO v. UNITED STATES, 390 U.S. 144 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

GARAFOLO v. UNITED STATES, 390 U.S. 144 (1968)

390 U.S. 144

GARAFOLO v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 866.
Decided January 29, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 385 F.2d 200, vacated and remanded.

Francis Heisler for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated. The case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Smith v. Illinois, ante, p. 129.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

Page 390 U.S. 144, 145

 


U.S. Supreme Court

GARAFOLO v. UNITED STATES, 390 U.S. 144 (1968)

390 U.S. 144

GARAFOLO v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 866.
Decided January 29, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 385 F.2d 200, vacated and remanded.

Francis Heisler for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated. The case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Smith v. Illinois, ante, p. 129.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

Page 390 U.S. 144, 145

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.