SMITH v. NOBLE DRILLING CORP., 390 U.S. 143 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

SMITH v. NOBLE DRILLING CORP., 390 U.S. 143 (1968)

390 U.S. 143

SMITH v. NOBLE DRILLING CORP.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 648.
Decided January 29, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Samuel C. Gainsburgh for petitioner.

W. Ford Reese for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana is granted. The judgment below is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Louisiana for further consideration in light of Billiot v. Sewart Seacraft, Inc., 382 F.2d 662 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1967), and Loffland Brothers Co. v. Huckabee, 373 F.2d 528 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1967).

Page 390 U.S. 143, 144

 


U.S. Supreme Court

SMITH v. NOBLE DRILLING CORP., 390 U.S. 143 (1968)

390 U.S. 143

SMITH v. NOBLE DRILLING CORP.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 648.
Decided January 29, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Samuel C. Gainsburgh for petitioner.

W. Ford Reese for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana is granted. The judgment below is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Louisiana for further consideration in light of Billiot v. Sewart Seacraft, Inc., 382 F.2d 662 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1967), and Loffland Brothers Co. v. Huckabee, 373 F.2d 528 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1967).

Page 390 U.S. 143, 144

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.