MILLER v. CALIFORNIA, 389 U.S. 968 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

MILLER v. CALIFORNIA , 389 U.S. 968 (1967)

389 U.S. 968

Lucille MILLER, petitioner,
v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 154.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 4, 1967

F. Lee Bailey and Alan M. Dershowitz, for petitioner.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Philip C. Griffin, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, granted limited to questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition which read as follows:

    '1. Whether the introduction of admissions made to an undercover agent planted in petitioner's jail cell constituted a violation of petitioner's constitutional rights to counsel and against self- incrimination.
    '2. Whether inculpatory admissions, obtained under circumstances like those here involved, can ever constitute harmless error.'

The case is placed on the summary calendar.[ Miller v. California 389 U.S. 968 (1967) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

MILLER v. CALIFORNIA , 389 U.S. 968 (1967)

389 U.S. 968

Lucille MILLER, petitioner,
v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 154.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 4, 1967

F. Lee Bailey and Alan M. Dershowitz, for petitioner.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Philip C. Griffin, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, granted limited to questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition which read as follows:

    '1. Whether the introduction of admissions made to an undercover agent planted in petitioner's jail cell constituted a violation of petitioner's constitutional rights to counsel and against self- incrimination.
    '2. Whether inculpatory admissions, obtained under circumstances like those here involved, can ever constitute harmless error.'

The case is placed on the summary calendar.[ Miller v. California 389 U.S. 968 (1967) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.