MILLER v. CALIFORNIA, 389 U.S. 968 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court
MILLER v. CALIFORNIA , 389 U.S. 968 (1967)389 U.S. 968
Lucille MILLER, petitioner,
v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 154.
Supreme Court of the United States
December 4, 1967
F. Lee Bailey and Alan M. Dershowitz, for petitioner.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Philip C. Griffin, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, granted limited to questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition which read as follows:
The case is placed on the summary calendar.[ Miller v.
California 389 U.S.
968 (1967) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
MILLER v. CALIFORNIA , 389 U.S. 968 (1967) 389 U.S. 968 Lucille MILLER, petitioner,v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 154. Supreme Court of the United States December 4, 1967 F. Lee Bailey and Alan M. Dershowitz, for petitioner. Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Philip C. Griffin, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, granted limited to questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition which read as follows: