NELLES v. BARTLETT, 389 U.S. 9 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

NELLES v. BARTLETT, 389 U.S. 9 (1967)

389 U.S. 9

NELLES v. BARTLETT, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF MICHIGAN,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN. No. 327.
Decided October 9, 1967.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

S. James Clarkson for appellant.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Eugene Krasicky, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


WATSON v. STATE OF MAINE COMMISSIONER OF BANKING, <a href="/cases/federal/us/389/9/case.html">389 U.S. 9</a> (1967) 389 U.S. 9 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WATSON v. STATE OF MAINE COMMISSIONER OF BANKING, 389 U.S. 9 (1967)

389 U.S. 9

WATSON, DBA MAINE-WIDE ADJUSTERS v. STATE OF MAINE COMMISSIONER OF
BANKING.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE. No. 332.
Decided October 9, 1967.

223 A. 2d 834, appeal dismissed.

Sanford Jay Rosen, Marvin Karpatkin, Melvin L. Wulf and Malcolm S. Stevenson for appellant.

James S. Erwin, Attorney General of Maine, George C. West, Deputy Attorney General, and Jerome S. Matus, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 389 U.S. 9, 10




U.S. Supreme Court

NELLES v. BARTLETT, 389 U.S. 9 (1967)

389 U.S. 9

NELLES v. BARTLETT, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF MICHIGAN,
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN. No. 327.
Decided October 9, 1967.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

S. James Clarkson for appellant.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Eugene Krasicky, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


WATSON v. STATE OF MAINE COMMISSIONER OF BANKING, <a href="/cases/federal/us/389/9/case.html">389 U.S. 9</a> (1967) 389 U.S. 9 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WATSON v. STATE OF MAINE COMMISSIONER OF BANKING, 389 U.S. 9 (1967)

389 U.S. 9

WATSON, DBA MAINE-WIDE ADJUSTERS v. STATE OF MAINE COMMISSIONER OF
BANKING.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MAINE. No. 332.
Decided October 9, 1967.

223 A. 2d 834, appeal dismissed.

Sanford Jay Rosen, Marvin Karpatkin, Melvin L. Wulf and Malcolm S. Stevenson for appellant.

James S. Erwin, Attorney General of Maine, George C. West, Deputy Attorney General, and Jerome S. Matus, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 389 U.S. 9, 10

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.