BALTIMORE & OHIO CHICAGO TERM. R. CO. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 88 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

BALTIMORE & OHIO CHICAGO TERM. R. CO. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 88 (1967)

389 U.S. 88

BALTIMORE & OHIO CHICAGO TERMINAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 539.
Decided November 6, 1967.

279 F. Supp. 270, affirmed.

John H. Gobel for appellants.

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Don McDevitt for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 389 U.S. 88, 89




U.S. Supreme Court

BALTIMORE & OHIO CHICAGO TERM. R. CO. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 88 (1967)

389 U.S. 88

BALTIMORE & OHIO CHICAGO TERMINAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 539.
Decided November 6, 1967.

279 F. Supp. 270, affirmed.

John H. Gobel for appellants.

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Don McDevitt for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 389 U.S. 88, 89

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.