BANKS v. CHICAGO GRAIN TRIMMERS ASS'N, INC, 389 U.S. 813 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

BANKS v. CHICAGO GRAIN TRIMMERS ASS'N, INC , 389 U.S. 813 (1967)

389 U.S. 813

Agnes M. BANKS, etc., petitioner,
v.
CHICAGO GRAIN TRIMMERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.
No. 59.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 9, 1967

Harold A. Liebenson, for petitioner.

Thomas P. Smith, for respondents.

Solicitor General Marshall, for the Deputy Commissioner (Department of Labor).

Motion of petitioner for leave to intervene granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted and case placed on the summary calendar.

Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.[ Banks v. Chicago Grain Trimmers Ass'n, Inc 389 U.S. 813 (1967) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

BANKS v. CHICAGO GRAIN TRIMMERS ASS'N, INC , 389 U.S. 813 (1967)

389 U.S. 813

Agnes M. BANKS, etc., petitioner,
v.
CHICAGO GRAIN TRIMMERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.
No. 59.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 9, 1967

Harold A. Liebenson, for petitioner.

Thomas P. Smith, for respondents.

Solicitor General Marshall, for the Deputy Commissioner (Department of Labor).

Motion of petitioner for leave to intervene granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted and case placed on the summary calendar.

Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.[ Banks v. Chicago Grain Trimmers Ass'n, Inc 389 U.S. 813 (1967) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.