PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM. v. BALTIMORE SHIPPERS & REC., 389 U.S. 583 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM. v. BALTIMORE SHIPPERS & REC., 389 U.S. 583 (1968)

389 U.S. 583

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. v. BALTIMORE SHIPPERS
& RECEIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 846.
Decided January 15, 1968.

 268 F. Supp. 836, affirmed.

Mary Moran Pajalich and Bernard A. Peeters for appellants.

Ronald N. Cobert and Philip R. Ehrenkranz for Baltimore Shippers & Receivers Association, Inc., et al., and Stanley E. Tobin and Carl M. Gould for Charles J. Worth Drayage Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 389 U.S. 583, 1

 


U.S. Supreme Court

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM. v. BALTIMORE SHIPPERS & REC., 389 U.S. 583 (1968)

389 U.S. 583

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. v. BALTIMORE SHIPPERS
& RECEIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 846.
Decided January 15, 1968.

 268 F. Supp. 836, affirmed.

Mary Moran Pajalich and Bernard A. Peeters for appellants.

Ronald N. Cobert and Philip R. Ehrenkranz for Baltimore Shippers & Receivers Association, Inc., et al., and Stanley E. Tobin and Carl M. Gould for Charles J. Worth Drayage Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 389 U.S. 583, 1

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.