PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM. v. BALTIMORE SHIPPERS & REC., 389 U.S. 583 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM. v. BALTIMORE SHIPPERS & REC., 389 U.S. 583 (1968)
389 U.S. 583 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. v. BALTIMORE SHIPPERS
& RECEIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 846.
Decided January 15, 1968.
268 F. Supp. 836, affirmed.
Mary Moran Pajalich and Bernard A. Peeters for appellants.
Ronald N. Cobert and Philip R. Ehrenkranz for Baltimore Shippers & Receivers Association, Inc., et al., and Stanley E. Tobin and Carl M. Gould for Charles J. Worth Drayage Co. et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM. v. BALTIMORE SHIPPERS & REC., 389 U.S. 583 (1968)
389 U.S. 583 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. v. BALTIMORE SHIPPERS
& RECEIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 846.
Decided January 15, 1968.
268 F. Supp. 836, affirmed.
Mary Moran Pajalich and Bernard A. Peeters for appellants.
Ronald N. Cobert and Philip R. Ehrenkranz for Baltimore Shippers & Receivers Association, Inc., et al., and Stanley E. Tobin and Carl M. Gould for Charles J. Worth Drayage Co. et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Page 389 U.S. 583, 1
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
