GOLDSTEIN v. COX, 389 U.S. 581 (1968)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

GOLDSTEIN v. COX, 389 U.S. 581 (1968)

389 U.S. 581

GOLDSTEIN, AKA PIETRARU, ET AL. v. COX ET AL., SURROGATES OF THE COUNTY
OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 825.
Decided January 15, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

John R. Vintilla, Emanuel Eschwege and Novak N. Marku for petitioners.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Zschernig v. Miller, ante, p. 429.

Page 389 U.S. 581, 582




U.S. Supreme Court

GOLDSTEIN v. COX, 389 U.S. 581 (1968)

389 U.S. 581

GOLDSTEIN, AKA PIETRARU, ET AL. v. COX ET AL., SURROGATES OF THE COUNTY
OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 825.
Decided January 15, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

John R. Vintilla, Emanuel Eschwege and Novak N. Marku for petitioners.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Zschernig v. Miller, ante, p. 429.

Page 389 U.S. 581, 582

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.