THRIFTY SHOPPERS SCRIP CO. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 580 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

THRIFTY SHOPPERS SCRIP CO. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 580 (1968)

389 U.S. 580

THRIFTY SHOPPERS SCRIP CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT
OF CALIFORNIA. No. 820.
Decided January 15, 1968.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 849, Twyman, dba Bill's Union Station, et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same court.

272 F. Supp. 432, affirmed.

David B. Gold for appellant in No. 820. Howard M. Downs for appellants in No. 849.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner and Daniel M. Friedman for the United States in both cases. William W. Alsup, Allyn O. Kreps, Arnold M. Lerman, William E. Mussman and Gordon Johnson for appellees Blue Chip Stamp Co. et al. in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 389 U.S. 580, 581




U.S. Supreme Court

THRIFTY SHOPPERS SCRIP CO. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 580 (1968)

389 U.S. 580

THRIFTY SHOPPERS SCRIP CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT
OF CALIFORNIA. No. 820.
Decided January 15, 1968.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 849, Twyman, dba Bill's Union Station, et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same court.

272 F. Supp. 432, affirmed.

David B. Gold for appellant in No. 820. Howard M. Downs for appellants in No. 849.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner and Daniel M. Friedman for the United States in both cases. William W. Alsup, Allyn O. Kreps, Arnold M. Lerman, William E. Mussman and Gordon Johnson for appellees Blue Chip Stamp Co. et al. in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 389 U.S. 580, 581

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.