OSBOURNE v. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY BARGE LINE CO., 389 U.S. 579 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

OSBOURNE v. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY BARGE LINE CO., 389 U.S. 579 (1968)

389 U.S. 579

OSBOURNE ET AL. v. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY BARGE LINE CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF MISSOURI. No. 768.
Decided January 15, 1968.

273 F. Supp. 1, affirmed.

John L. Laubach, Jr., for appellants Osbourne et al.

Arthur L. Winn, Jr., Samuel H. Moerman, J. Raymond Clark and James M. Henderson for Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. et al., and Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and judgment is affirmed without prejudice to the presentation of an appropriate motion in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri for a modification of the injunction.

Page 389 U.S. 579, 580




U.S. Supreme Court

OSBOURNE v. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY BARGE LINE CO., 389 U.S. 579 (1968)

389 U.S. 579

OSBOURNE ET AL. v. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY BARGE LINE CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF MISSOURI. No. 768.
Decided January 15, 1968.

273 F. Supp. 1, affirmed.

John L. Laubach, Jr., for appellants Osbourne et al.

Arthur L. Winn, Jr., Samuel H. Moerman, J. Raymond Clark and James M. Henderson for Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. et al., and Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and judgment is affirmed without prejudice to the presentation of an appropriate motion in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri for a modification of the injunction.

Page 389 U.S. 579, 580

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.