OSBOURNE v. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY BARGE LINE CO., 389 U.S. 579 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
OSBOURNE v. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY BARGE LINE CO., 389 U.S. 579 (1968) 389 U.S. 579OSBOURNE ET AL. v. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY
BARGE LINE CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT
OF MISSOURI. No. 768.
Decided January 15, 1968.
273 F. Supp. 1, affirmed.
John L. Laubach, Jr., for appellants Osbourne et al.
Arthur L. Winn, Jr., Samuel H. Moerman, J. Raymond Clark and James M. Henderson for Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. et al., and Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and judgment is affirmed without prejudice to the presentation of an appropriate motion in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri for a modification of the injunction.
U.S. Supreme Court
OSBOURNE v. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY BARGE LINE CO., 389 U.S. 579 (1968) 389 U.S. 579 OSBOURNE ET AL. v. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY BARGE LINE CO. ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF MISSOURI. No. 768.
Decided January 15, 1968.
273 F. Supp. 1, affirmed. John L. Laubach, Jr., for appellants Osbourne et al. Arthur L. Winn, Jr., Samuel H. Moerman, J. Raymond Clark and James M. Henderson for Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. et al., and Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and judgment is affirmed without prejudice to the presentation of an appropriate motion in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri for a modification of the injunction. Page 389 U.S. 579, 580
