NATIONAL SMALL SHIPMENTS TRAF. v. RINGSBY TRUCK LINES, 389 U.S. 576 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

NATIONAL SMALL SHIPMENTS TRAF. v. RINGSBY TRUCK LINES, 389 U.S. 576 (1968)

389 U.S. 576

NATIONAL SMALL SHIPMENTS TRAFFIC CONFERENCE, INC., ET AL. v. RINGSBY TRUCK
LINES, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 163.
Decided January 15, 1968.

 263 F. Supp. 552, appeal dismissed.

Arthur A. Arsham, John J. C. Martin and Max L. Wymore for appellants.

LeGrand Alf Carlston and Z. L. Pearson, Jr., for appellees.

Solicitor General Griswold, former Solicitor General Marshall and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed as moot.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 389 U.S. 576, 577

 


U.S. Supreme Court

NATIONAL SMALL SHIPMENTS TRAF. v. RINGSBY TRUCK LINES, 389 U.S. 576 (1968)

389 U.S. 576

NATIONAL SMALL SHIPMENTS TRAFFIC CONFERENCE, INC., ET AL. v. RINGSBY TRUCK
LINES, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 163.
Decided January 15, 1968.

 263 F. Supp. 552, appeal dismissed.

Arthur A. Arsham, John J. C. Martin and Max L. Wymore for appellants.

LeGrand Alf Carlston and Z. L. Pearson, Jr., for appellees.

Solicitor General Griswold, former Solicitor General Marshall and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed as moot.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 389 U.S. 576, 577

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.