UNITED STATES v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CO., 389 U.S. 575 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CO., 389 U.S. 575 (1968)
389 U.S. 575 UNITED STATES v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CO. ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 130.
Decided January 15, 1968.
Certiorari granted; 374 F.2d 656, judgments vacated and remanded.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Sanders, Alan S. Rosenthal and Martin Jacobs for the United States.
David R. Owen for Bethlehem Steel Co. and William A. Grimes for Moran Towing & Transportation Co., Inc., respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit are vacated and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings in light of this Court's decision in Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United States, ante, p. 191.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
UNITED STATES v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CO., 389 U.S. 575 (1968)
389 U.S. 575 UNITED STATES v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CO. ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 130.
Decided January 15, 1968.
Certiorari granted; 374 F.2d 656, judgments vacated and remanded.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Sanders, Alan S. Rosenthal and Martin Jacobs for the United States.
David R. Owen for Bethlehem Steel Co. and William A. Grimes for Moran Towing & Transportation Co., Inc., respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit are vacated and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings in light of this Court's decision in Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United States, ante, p. 191.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Page 389 U.S. 575, 576
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
