LOUISIANA FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMM. v. POINDEXTER, 389 U.S. 571 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

LOUISIANA FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMM. v. POINDEXTER, 389 U.S. 571 (1968)

389 U.S. 571

LOUISIANA FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMMISSION ET AL. v. POINDEXTER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF LOUISIANA. No. 793.
Decided January 15, 1968.

275 F. Supp. 833, affirmed.

Victor A. Sachse, J. J. Davidson, Jr., S. W. Provensal, Jr., and C. C. Wood for appellants.

A. P. Tureaud, Jack Greenberg and Charles H. Jones, Jr., for Poindexter et al., and Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Doar for the United States, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

BUCK v. NEW JERSEY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/389/571/case.html">389 U.S. 571</a> (1968) 389 U.S. 571 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BUCK v. NEW JERSEY, 389 U.S. 571 (1968)

389 U.S. 571

BUCK ET UX. v. NEW JERSEY BY THE STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSIONER.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 817.
Decided January 15, 1968.

49 N. J. 359, 230 A. 2d 393, appeal dismissed.

James T. Dowd for appellants.

Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Elias Abelson and Edward D. McKirdy, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 389 U.S. 571, 572




U.S. Supreme Court

LOUISIANA FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMM. v. POINDEXTER, 389 U.S. 571 (1968)

389 U.S. 571

LOUISIANA FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE COMMISSION ET AL. v. POINDEXTER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF LOUISIANA. No. 793.
Decided January 15, 1968.

275 F. Supp. 833, affirmed.

Victor A. Sachse, J. J. Davidson, Jr., S. W. Provensal, Jr., and C. C. Wood for appellants.

A. P. Tureaud, Jack Greenberg and Charles H. Jones, Jr., for Poindexter et al., and Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Doar for the United States, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

BUCK v. NEW JERSEY, <a href="/cases/federal/us/389/571/case.html">389 U.S. 571</a> (1968) 389 U.S. 571 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BUCK v. NEW JERSEY, 389 U.S. 571 (1968)

389 U.S. 571

BUCK ET UX. v. NEW JERSEY BY THE STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSIONER.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 817.
Decided January 15, 1968.

49 N. J. 359, 230 A. 2d 393, appeal dismissed.

James T. Dowd for appellants.

Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Elias Abelson and Edward D. McKirdy, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 389 U.S. 571, 572

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.