BRASWELL MOTOR FREIGHT LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 569 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

BRASWELL MOTOR FREIGHT LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 569 (1968)

389 U.S. 569

BRASWELL MOTOR FREIGHT LINES, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF TEXAS. No. 790.
Decided January 15, 1968.

275 F. Supp. 98, affirmed.

T. S. Christopher for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Emmanuel H. Smith for the United States et al.; David Axelrod for Pacific Intermountain Express Co. et al., and Wentworth E. Griffin and Phillip Robinson for Transcon Lines, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

SEASIDE PROPERTIES v. STATE ROAD DEP'T OF FLORIDA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/389/569/case.html">389 U.S. 569</a> (1968) 389 U.S. 569 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SEASIDE PROPERTIES v. STATE ROAD DEP'T OF FLORIDA, 389 U.S. 569 (1968)

389 U.S. 569

SEASIDE PROPERTIES, INC. v. STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT.
No. 754.
Decided January 15, 1968.

190 So.2d 391, appeal dismissed.

Guion T. De Loach for appellant.

P. A. Pacyna for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 389 U.S. 569, 570




U.S. Supreme Court

BRASWELL MOTOR FREIGHT LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 569 (1968)

389 U.S. 569

BRASWELL MOTOR FREIGHT LINES, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF TEXAS. No. 790.
Decided January 15, 1968.

275 F. Supp. 98, affirmed.

T. S. Christopher for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Emmanuel H. Smith for the United States et al.; David Axelrod for Pacific Intermountain Express Co. et al., and Wentworth E. Griffin and Phillip Robinson for Transcon Lines, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

SEASIDE PROPERTIES v. STATE ROAD DEP'T OF FLORIDA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/389/569/case.html">389 U.S. 569</a> (1968) 389 U.S. 569 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SEASIDE PROPERTIES v. STATE ROAD DEP'T OF FLORIDA, 389 U.S. 569 (1968)

389 U.S. 569

SEASIDE PROPERTIES, INC. v. STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT.
No. 754.
Decided January 15, 1968.

190 So.2d 391, appeal dismissed.

Guion T. De Loach for appellant.

P. A. Pacyna for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 389 U.S. 569, 570

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.