CHANDLER v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 568 (1968)

U.S. Supreme Court

CHANDLER v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 568 (1968)

389 U.S. 568

CHANDLER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 480.
Decided January 15, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Thomas J. Kenan and Carl L. Shipley for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the respondent's suggestion of mootness and our independent examination of the papers, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is vacated. The case is remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the mandamus proceedings as moot.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


BOYDEN v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/389/568/case.html">389 U.S. 568</a> (1968) 389 U.S. 568 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BOYDEN v. CALIFORNIA, 389 U.S. 568 (1968)

389 U.S. 568

BOYDEN v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 730, Misc.
Decided January 15, 1968.

251 Cal. App. 2d 798, 60 Cal. Rptr. 271, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 389 U.S. 568, 569




U.S. Supreme Court

CHANDLER v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 568 (1968)

389 U.S. 568

CHANDLER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 480.
Decided January 15, 1968.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Thomas J. Kenan and Carl L. Shipley for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the respondent's suggestion of mootness and our independent examination of the papers, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is vacated. The case is remanded to that court with instructions to dismiss the mandamus proceedings as moot.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


BOYDEN v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/389/568/case.html">389 U.S. 568</a> (1968) 389 U.S. 568 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BOYDEN v. CALIFORNIA, 389 U.S. 568 (1968)

389 U.S. 568

BOYDEN v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT.
No. 730, Misc.
Decided January 15, 1968.

251 Cal. App. 2d 798, 60 Cal. Rptr. 271, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 389 U.S. 568, 569

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.