GARBER v. KANSAS, 389 U.S. 51 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

GARBER v. KANSAS, 389 U.S. 51 (1967)

389 U.S. 51

GARBER v. KANSAS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 393.
Decided October 23, 1967.

197 Kan. 567, 419 P.2d 896, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Marvin M. Karpatkin, E. Dexter Galloway and Melvin L. Wulf for appellant.

Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Leo Pfeffer for the National Committee for Amish Religious Freedom, as amicus curiae, in support of appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 389 U.S. 51, 52

 


U.S. Supreme Court

GARBER v. KANSAS, 389 U.S. 51 (1967)

389 U.S. 51

GARBER v. KANSAS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 393.
Decided October 23, 1967.

197 Kan. 567, 419 P.2d 896, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Marvin M. Karpatkin, E. Dexter Galloway and Melvin L. Wulf for appellant.

Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Leo Pfeffer for the National Committee for Amish Religious Freedom, as amicus curiae, in support of appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 389 U.S. 51, 52

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.