CONNER v. CITY OF HAMMOND, 389 U.S. 48 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

CONNER v. CITY OF HAMMOND, 389 U.S. 48 (1967)

389 U.S. 48

CONNER v. CITY OF HAMMOND.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT, LOUISIANA, PARISH OF TANGIPAHOA. No. 259.
Decided October 23, 1967.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Leonard B. Levy and Stanley Fleishman for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Twenty-first Judicial District Court for the Parish of Tangipahoa, Louisiana, is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 389 U.S. 48, 49




U.S. Supreme Court

CONNER v. CITY OF HAMMOND, 389 U.S. 48 (1967)

389 U.S. 48

CONNER v. CITY OF HAMMOND.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT, LOUISIANA, PARISH OF TANGIPAHOA. No. 259.
Decided October 23, 1967.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Leonard B. Levy and Stanley Fleishman for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Twenty-first Judicial District Court for the Parish of Tangipahoa, Louisiana, is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 389 U.S. 48, 49

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.