LANTZ v. LYNDEN TRANSFER, INC., 389 U.S. 426 (1967)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

LANTZ v. LYNDEN TRANSFER, INC., 389 U.S. 426 (1967) 389 U.S. 426

LANTZ, DBA ALASKA TRUCK TRANSPORT, INC. v. LYNDEN TRANSFER, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF WASHINGTON. No. 623.
Decided December 18, 1967.

263 F. Supp. 336, affirmed.

James T. Johnson for appellee Lynden Transfer, Inc.

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of Douglas Lantz for leave to intervene and for other relief is denied. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

BURKE-PARSONS-BOWLBY CORP. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/389/426/case.html">389 U.S. 426</a> (1967) 389 U.S. 426 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BURKE-PARSONS-BOWLBY CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 426 (1967) 389 U.S. 426

BURKE-PARSONS-BOWLBY CORP. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 711.
Decided December 18, 1967.

268 F. Supp. 203, affirmed.

Gordon P. MacDougall for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and Laidler B. Mackall for the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 389 U.S. 426, 427




U.S. Supreme Court

LANTZ v. LYNDEN TRANSFER, INC., 389 U.S. 426 (1967) 389 U.S. 426

LANTZ, DBA ALASKA TRUCK TRANSPORT, INC. v. LYNDEN TRANSFER, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF WASHINGTON. No. 623.
Decided December 18, 1967.

263 F. Supp. 336, affirmed.

James T. Johnson for appellee Lynden Transfer, Inc.

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of Douglas Lantz for leave to intervene and for other relief is denied. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

BURKE-PARSONS-BOWLBY CORP. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/389/426/case.html">389 U.S. 426</a> (1967) 389 U.S. 426 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BURKE-PARSONS-BOWLBY CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 426 (1967) 389 U.S. 426

BURKE-PARSONS-BOWLBY CORP. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 711.
Decided December 18, 1967.

268 F. Supp. 203, affirmed.

Gordon P. MacDougall for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and Laidler B. Mackall for the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 389 U.S. 426, 427

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.