UNITED NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. CALIFORNIA, 389 U.S. 330 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. CALIFORNIA, 389 U.S. 330 (1967)

389 U.S. 330

UNITED NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 669.
Decided December 11, 1967.

66 Cal. 2d 577, 427 P.2d 199, appeal dismissed.

Hugh P. Cox, Henry P. Sailer, Dennis G. Lyons and William W. Vaughn for appellants.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and H. Warren Siegel, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case assigned for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


DEMERS v. LANGTON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/389/330/case.html">389 U.S. 330</a> (1967) 389 U.S. 330 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DEMERS v. LANGTON, 389 U.S. 330 (1967)

389 U.S. 330

DEMERS v. LANGTON, TAX ADMINISTRATOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF RHODE ISLAND.
No. 650, Misc.
Decided December 11, 1967.

___ R. I. ___, 230 A. 2d 870, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 389 U.S. 330, 331




U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. CALIFORNIA, 389 U.S. 330 (1967)

389 U.S. 330

UNITED NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 669.
Decided December 11, 1967.

66 Cal. 2d 577, 427 P.2d 199, appeal dismissed.

Hugh P. Cox, Henry P. Sailer, Dennis G. Lyons and William W. Vaughn for appellants.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and H. Warren Siegel, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case assigned for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


DEMERS v. LANGTON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/389/330/case.html">389 U.S. 330</a> (1967) 389 U.S. 330 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DEMERS v. LANGTON, 389 U.S. 330 (1967)

389 U.S. 330

DEMERS v. LANGTON, TAX ADMINISTRATOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF RHODE ISLAND.
No. 650, Misc.
Decided December 11, 1967.

___ R. I. ___, 230 A. 2d 870, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 389 U.S. 330, 331

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.