UNITED NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. CALIFORNIA, 389 U.S. 330 (1967)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. CALIFORNIA, 389 U.S. 330 (1967) 389 U.S. 330

UNITED NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 669.
Decided December 11, 1967.

 66 Cal. 2d 577, 427 P.2d 199, appeal dismissed.

Hugh P. Cox, Henry P. Sailer, Dennis G. Lyons and William W. Vaughn for appellants.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and H. Warren Siegel, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case assigned for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


389 U.S. 330 (1967) 389 U.S. 330 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DEMERS v. LANGTON, 389 U.S. 330 (1967) 389 U.S. 330

DEMERS v. LANGTON, TAX ADMINISTRATOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF RHODE ISLAND.
No. 650, Misc.
Decided December 11, 1967.

___ R. I. ___, 230 A.2d 870, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 389 U.S. 330, 331

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. CALIFORNIA, 389 U.S. 330 (1967) 389 U.S. 330 UNITED NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 669.
Decided December 11, 1967.

 66 Cal. 2d 577, 427 P.2d 199, appeal dismissed.

Hugh P. Cox, Henry P. Sailer, Dennis G. Lyons and William W. Vaughn for appellants.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and H. Warren Siegel, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case assigned for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


389 U.S. 330 (1967) 389 U.S. 330 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DEMERS v. LANGTON, 389 U.S. 330 (1967) 389 U.S. 330 DEMERS v. LANGTON, TAX ADMINISTRATOR.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF RHODE ISLAND.
No. 650, Misc.
Decided December 11, 1967.

___ R. I. ___, 230 A.2d 870, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 389 U.S. 330, 331