GERMANN v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 329 (1967)

Decided: December 11, 1967
Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

GERMANN v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 329 (1967) 389 U.S. 329

GERMANN v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT
OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 384.
Decided December 11, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 370 F.2d 1019, vacated and remanded.

Louis Bender for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Ralph S. Spritzer, Beatrice Rosenberg and Paul C. Summitt for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for certiorari is granted.

The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in order to give that court an opportunity to consider the motion to substitute the Konkursamt Basel-Stadt (the Bankruptcy Office of Basel, Switzerland) as party petitioner, and to reconsider that court's former adjudication of contempt and the accompanying fine in light of the original petitioner's death.

It is so ordered.

Page 389 U.S. 329, 330

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

GERMANN v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 329 (1967) 389 U.S. 329 GERMANN v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT
OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 384.
Decided December 11, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 370 F.2d 1019, vacated and remanded.

Louis Bender for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Ralph S. Spritzer, Beatrice Rosenberg and Paul C. Summitt for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for certiorari is granted.

The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in order to give that court an opportunity to consider the motion to substitute the Konkursamt Basel-Stadt (the Bankruptcy Office of Basel, Switzerland) as party petitioner, and to reconsider that court's former adjudication of contempt and the accompanying fine in light of the original petitioner's death.

It is so ordered. Page 389 U.S. 329, 330