LORDI v. EPSTEIN, 389 U.S. 29 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court
LORDI v. EPSTEIN, 389 U.S. 29 (1967)
389 U.S. 29 LORDI, DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, DEPARTMENT
OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY OF NEW JERSEY v. EPSTEIN ET AL.,
TRADING AS STRATFORD INTERNATIONAL TOBACCO CO. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW
JERSEY.
No. 322.Decided October 16, 1967.
261 F. Supp. 921, affirmed.
Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Joseph A. Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
Charles H. Tuttle for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Cf. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.
U.S. Supreme Court
LORDI v. EPSTEIN, 389 U.S. 29 (1967)
389 U.S. 29 LORDI, DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, DEPARTMENT
OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY OF NEW JERSEY v. EPSTEIN ET AL.,
TRADING AS STRATFORD INTERNATIONAL TOBACCO CO. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW
JERSEY.
No. 322.Decided October 16, 1967.
261 F. Supp. 921, affirmed.
Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Joseph A. Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
Charles H. Tuttle for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Cf. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
