LORDI v. EPSTEIN, 389 U.S. 29 (1967)
Syllabus
Decided October 16, 1967.
U.S. Supreme Court
LORDI v. EPSTEIN, 389 U.S. 29 (1967) 389 U.S. 29LORDI, DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OF
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, DEPARTMENT
OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY OF NEW JERSEY v. EPSTEIN ET AL.,
TRADING AS STRATFORD INTERNATIONAL TOBACCO CO. APPEAL FROM THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW
Decided October 16, 1967.
261 F. Supp. 921, affirmed.
Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Joseph A. Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
Charles H. Tuttle for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Cf. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.
Opinions
OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY OF NEW JERSEY v. EPSTEIN ET AL.,
TRADING AS STRATFORD INTERNATIONAL TOBACCO CO. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 322.
Decided October 16, 1967.
261 F. Supp. 921, affirmed. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Joseph A. Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. Charles H. Tuttle for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Cf. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument. Page 389 U.S. 29, 30
U.S. Supreme Court
LORDI v. EPSTEIN, 389 U.S. 29 (1967) 389 U.S. 29 LORDI, DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, DEPARTMENTOF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY OF NEW JERSEY v. EPSTEIN ET AL.,
TRADING AS STRATFORD INTERNATIONAL TOBACCO CO. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 322.
Decided October 16, 1967.
261 F. Supp. 921, affirmed. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Joseph A. Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. Charles H. Tuttle for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Cf. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument. Page 389 U.S. 29, 30
Search This Case
