ASSOCIATED PRESS v. WALKER, 389 U.S. 28 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

ASSOCIATED PRESS v. WALKER, 389 U.S. 28 (1967)

389 U.S. 28

ASSOCIATED PRESS v. WALKER.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OF
LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 306.
Decided October 16, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 191 So. 2d 727, reversed and remanded.

William P. Rogers, Leo P. Larkin, Jr., Stanley Godofsky, Arthur Moynihan, Earl T. Thomas, John T. Guyton and Billy R. Pesnell for petitioner.

W. Scott Wilkinson and Clyde J. Watts for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, with whom MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS joins, concurs in the result for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE BLACK'S separate opinion in Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130, 170.

Page 389 U.S. 28, 29

 


U.S. Supreme Court

ASSOCIATED PRESS v. WALKER, 389 U.S. 28 (1967)

389 U.S. 28

ASSOCIATED PRESS v. WALKER.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OF
LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 306.
Decided October 16, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 191 So. 2d 727, reversed and remanded.

William P. Rogers, Leo P. Larkin, Jr., Stanley Godofsky, Arthur Moynihan, Earl T. Thomas, John T. Guyton and Billy R. Pesnell for petitioner.

W. Scott Wilkinson and Clyde J. Watts for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, with whom MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS joins, concurs in the result for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE BLACK'S separate opinion in Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130, 170.

Page 389 U.S. 28, 29

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.