WALLACE v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 215 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

WALLACE v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 215 (1967)

389 U.S. 215

WALLACE, GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT
OF ALABAMA. No. 489.
Decided December 4, 1967.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 671, Bibb County Board of Education et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same court.

 267 F. Supp. 458, affirmed.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and John C. Satterfield for appellants in No. 489. Reid B. Barnes for appellants in No. 671.

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Doar, Louis F. Claiborne and David L. Norman for the United States in No. 489; Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Doar for the United States in No. 671; Fred D. Gray, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Charles H. Jones, Jr., Charles Stephen Ralston and Melvyn Zarr for Lee et al. in both cases, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 389 U.S. 215, 216

 


U.S. Supreme Court

WALLACE v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 215 (1967)

389 U.S. 215

WALLACE, GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT
OF ALABAMA. No. 489.
Decided December 4, 1967.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 671, Bibb County Board of Education et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same court.

 267 F. Supp. 458, affirmed.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and John C. Satterfield for appellants in No. 489. Reid B. Barnes for appellants in No. 671.

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Doar, Louis F. Claiborne and David L. Norman for the United States in No. 489; Solicitor General Griswold and Assistant Attorney General Doar for the United States in No. 671; Fred D. Gray, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Charles H. Jones, Jr., Charles Stephen Ralston and Melvyn Zarr for Lee et al. in both cases, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 389 U.S. 215, 216

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.