PRICE v. STATE ROAD COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA, 389 U.S. 14 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

PRICE v. STATE ROAD COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA, 389 U.S. 14 (1967)

389 U.S. 14

PRICE, DBA HOWARD PRICE & CO. v. STATE ROAD COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WEST VIRGINIA, KANAWHA COUNTY. No. 176.
Decided October 9, 1967.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 177, Wetherall et al. v. State Road Commission of West Virginia et al., also on appeal from the same court.

Appeals dismissed and certiorari denied.

Carney M. Layne and Charles W. Yeager for appellants in both cases.

C. Donald Robertson, Attorney General of West Virginia, and George H. Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 389 U.S. 14, 15




U.S. Supreme Court

PRICE v. STATE ROAD COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA, 389 U.S. 14 (1967)

389 U.S. 14

PRICE, DBA HOWARD PRICE & CO. v. STATE ROAD COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WEST VIRGINIA, KANAWHA COUNTY. No. 176.
Decided October 9, 1967.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 177, Wetherall et al. v. State Road Commission of West Virginia et al., also on appeal from the same court.

Appeals dismissed and certiorari denied.

Carney M. Layne and Charles W. Yeager for appellants in both cases.

C. Donald Robertson, Attorney General of West Virginia, and George H. Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 389 U.S. 14, 15

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.