SANDOVAL v. UTAH, 388 U.S. 463 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

SANDOVAL v. UTAH, 388 U.S. 463 (1967)

388 U.S. 463

SANDOVAL v. UTAH.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF UTAH.
No. 1107, Misc.
Decided June 12, 1967.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Jimi Mitsunaga for petitioner.

Phil L. Hansen, Attorney General of Utah, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Utah in light of the representations of the Attorney General that the petitioner was entitled to the transcription of the mechanical recording of the juvenile court hearing at the expense of the Salt Lake County or other governmental entity having jurisdiction.

Page 388 U.S. 463, 464




U.S. Supreme Court

SANDOVAL v. UTAH, 388 U.S. 463 (1967)

388 U.S. 463

SANDOVAL v. UTAH.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF UTAH.
No. 1107, Misc.
Decided June 12, 1967.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Jimi Mitsunaga for petitioner.

Phil L. Hansen, Attorney General of Utah, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Utah in light of the representations of the Attorney General that the petitioner was entitled to the transcription of the mechanical recording of the juvenile court hearing at the expense of the Salt Lake County or other governmental entity having jurisdiction.

Page 388 U.S. 463, 464

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.