A QUANTITY OF COPIES OF BOOKS v. KANSAS, 388 U.S. 452 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

A QUANTITY OF COPIES OF BOOKS v. KANSAS, 388 U.S. 452 (1967)

388 U.S. 452

A QUANTITY OF COPIES OF BOOKS ET AL. v. KANSAS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 865.
Decided June 12, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 197 Kan. 306, 416 P.2d 703, reversed.

Stanley Fleishman for petitioners.

Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Kansas is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE would grant the petition and set the case for oral argument in light of A Quantity of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK would grant the petition and affirm the judgment.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Page 388 U.S. 452, 453




U.S. Supreme Court

A QUANTITY OF COPIES OF BOOKS v. KANSAS, 388 U.S. 452 (1967)

388 U.S. 452

A QUANTITY OF COPIES OF BOOKS ET AL. v. KANSAS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 865.
Decided June 12, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 197 Kan. 306, 416 P.2d 703, reversed.

Stanley Fleishman for petitioners.

Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Kansas is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE would grant the petition and set the case for oral argument in light of A Quantity of Books v. Kansas, 378 U.S. 205.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK would grant the petition and affirm the judgment.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Page 388 U.S. 452, 453

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.