BURKARD v. NEW YORK, 388 U.S. 451 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

BURKARD v. NEW YORK, 388 U.S. 451 (1967)

388 U.S. 451

BURKARD ET AL. v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 807.
Decided June 12, 1967.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 808, Habel et al. v. New York, also on appeal from the same court.

18 N. Y. 2d 148, 219 N. E. 2d 183, appeals dismissed and certiorari denied.

Victor Rabinowitz, Leonard B. Boudin and Samuel A. Neuberger for appellants in No. 807. Edward Bennett Williams and Raymond W. Bergan for appellants in No. 808.

Frank S. Hogan for appellee in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 388 U.S. 451, 452




U.S. Supreme Court

BURKARD v. NEW YORK, 388 U.S. 451 (1967)

388 U.S. 451

BURKARD ET AL. v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 807.
Decided June 12, 1967.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 808, Habel et al. v. New York, also on appeal from the same court.

18 N. Y. 2d 148, 219 N. E. 2d 183, appeals dismissed and certiorari denied.

Victor Rabinowitz, Leonard B. Boudin and Samuel A. Neuberger for appellants in No. 807. Edward Bennett Williams and Raymond W. Bergan for appellants in No. 808.

Frank S. Hogan for appellee in both cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were taken as petitions for writs of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 388 U.S. 451, 452

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.