FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK, 388 U.S. 441 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK, 388 U.S. 441 (1967)

388 U.S. 441

FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME
COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 7.
Decided June 12, 1967.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Ira H. Holley and Eugene Gressman for petitioner.

Frank S. Hogan for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Page 388 U.S. 441, 442




U.S. Supreme Court

FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK, 388 U.S. 441 (1967)

388 U.S. 441

FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME
COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 7.
Decided June 12, 1967.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Ira H. Holley and Eugene Gressman for petitioner.

Frank S. Hogan for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Page 388 U.S. 441, 442

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.