WIRTZ v. LOCAL UNIONS NOS. 9, 9-A, & 9-B, 387 U.S. 96 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

WIRTZ v. LOCAL UNIONS NOS. 9, 9-A, & 9-B, 387 U.S. 96 (1967)

387 U.S. 96

WIRTZ, SECRETARY OF LABOR v. LOCAL UNIONS NOS. 9, 9-A, & 9-B, INTERNATIONAL
UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 1116.
Decided May 15, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 254 F. Supp. 980 and 366 F.2d 911, vacated and remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Sanders, Nathan Lewin, Alan S. Rosenthal, Robert C. McDiarmid, Charles Donahue, Edward D. Friedman and James R. Beaird for petitioner.

J. Albert Woll for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the joint suggestion of the parties and an independent examination of the case, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgments are vacated and the case is remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot.

Page 387 U.S. 96, 97




U.S. Supreme Court

WIRTZ v. LOCAL UNIONS NOS. 9, 9-A, & 9-B, 387 U.S. 96 (1967)

387 U.S. 96

WIRTZ, SECRETARY OF LABOR v. LOCAL UNIONS NOS. 9, 9-A, & 9-B, INTERNATIONAL
UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 1116.
Decided May 15, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 254 F. Supp. 980 and 366 F.2d 911, vacated and remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Sanders, Nathan Lewin, Alan S. Rosenthal, Robert C. McDiarmid, Charles Donahue, Edward D. Friedman and James R. Beaird for petitioner.

J. Albert Woll for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the joint suggestion of the parties and an independent examination of the case, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgments are vacated and the case is remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot.

Page 387 U.S. 96, 97

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.