ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES, 387 U.S. 573 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES, 387 U.S. 573 (1967)

387 U.S. 573

ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
ARKANSAS. No. 1159.
Decided June 5, 1967.

263 F. Supp. 480, affirmed.

Dickson R. Loos for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al. Harry B. LaTourette and Robert H. Stahlheber for rail carrier appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 387 U.S. 573, 574




U.S. Supreme Court

ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES, 387 U.S. 573 (1967)

387 U.S. 573

ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
ARKANSAS. No. 1159.
Decided June 5, 1967.

263 F. Supp. 480, affirmed.

Dickson R. Loos for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al. Harry B. LaTourette and Robert H. Stahlheber for rail carrier appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 387 U.S. 573, 574

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.