ELLIOTT v. OREGON, 387 U.S. 571 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

ELLIOTT v. OREGON, 387 U.S. 571 (1967) 387 U.S. 571

ELLIOTT v. OREGON.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 1144, Misc.
Decided June 5, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 244 Ore. 426, 418 P.2d 263, vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Oregon for further consideration in light of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.


CLARK v. ALABAMA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/387/571/case.html">387 U.S. 571</a> (1967) 387 U.S. 571 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CLARK v. ALABAMA, 387 U.S. 571 (1967) 387 U.S. 571

CLARK v. ALABAMA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 1579, Misc.
Decided June 5, 1967.

280 Ala. 493, 195 So.2d 786, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Petitioner pro se.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, John G. Bookout, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Robert F. Miller, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 387 U.S. 571, 572




U.S. Supreme Court

ELLIOTT v. OREGON, 387 U.S. 571 (1967) 387 U.S. 571

ELLIOTT v. OREGON.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 1144, Misc.
Decided June 5, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 244 Ore. 426, 418 P.2d 263, vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Oregon for further consideration in light of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.


CLARK v. ALABAMA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/387/571/case.html">387 U.S. 571</a> (1967) 387 U.S. 571 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CLARK v. ALABAMA, 387 U.S. 571 (1967) 387 U.S. 571

CLARK v. ALABAMA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 1579, Misc.
Decided June 5, 1967.

280 Ala. 493, 195 So.2d 786, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Petitioner pro se.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, John G. Bookout, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Robert F. Miller, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 387 U.S. 571, 572

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.