JULIAN MESSNER, INC., v. SPAHN, 387 U.S. 239 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

JULIAN MESSNER, INC., v. SPAHN, 387 U.S. 239 (1967)

387 U.S. 239

JULIAN MESSNER, INC., ET AL. v. SPAHN.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1154.
Decided May 22, 1967.

18 N. Y. 2d 324, 221 N. E. 2d 543, vacated and remanded.

Selig J. Levitan for appellants.

Arthur K. Radin for appellee.

Irwin Karp for Authors League of America, Inc., as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the Authors League of America, Inc., for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of New York for further consideration in light of Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS would dismiss the appeal for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 387 U.S. 239, 240




U.S. Supreme Court

JULIAN MESSNER, INC., v. SPAHN, 387 U.S. 239 (1967)

387 U.S. 239

JULIAN MESSNER, INC., ET AL. v. SPAHN.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1154.
Decided May 22, 1967.

18 N. Y. 2d 324, 221 N. E. 2d 543, vacated and remanded.

Selig J. Levitan for appellants.

Arthur K. Radin for appellee.

Irwin Karp for Authors League of America, Inc., as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the Authors League of America, Inc., for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of New York for further consideration in light of Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS would dismiss the appeal for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 387 U.S. 239, 240

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.