UNITED STATES v. MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK STOCK CORP., 387 U.S. 238 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK STOCK CORP., 387 U.S. 238 (1967)

387 U.S. 238

UNITED STATES v. MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK STOCK CORP. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
WISCONSIN. No. 1017.
Decided May 22, 1967.

255 F. Supp. 273, reversed.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Nathan Lewin, Howard E. Shapiro and Herbert G. Schoepke for the United States.

Maxwell H. Herriott and Louis Quarles for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. Section 11 (e) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, 80 Stat. 241; United States v. First City National Bank of Houston, 386 U.S. 361.

Page 387 U.S. 238, 239

 


U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK STOCK CORP., 387 U.S. 238 (1967)

387 U.S. 238

UNITED STATES v. MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK STOCK CORP. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
WISCONSIN. No. 1017.
Decided May 22, 1967.

255 F. Supp. 273, reversed.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Nathan Lewin, Howard E. Shapiro and Herbert G. Schoepke for the United States.

Maxwell H. Herriott and Louis Quarles for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed. Section 11 (e) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, 80 Stat. 241; United States v. First City National Bank of Houston, 386 U.S. 361.

Page 387 U.S. 238, 239

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.