ARMORED CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 778 (1967)

U.S. Supreme Court

ARMORED CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 778 (1967)

386 U.S. 778

ARMORED CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1011.
Decided May 8, 1967.

260 F. Supp. 612, affirmed.

J. Kevin Murphy for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Seymour D. Lewis for B. D.C. Corp., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.




U.S. Supreme Court

ARMORED CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 778 (1967)

386 U.S. 778

ARMORED CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1011.
Decided May 8, 1967.

260 F. Supp. 612, affirmed.

J. Kevin Murphy for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Seymour D. Lewis for B. D.C. Corp., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.