ARMORED CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 778 (1967)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
ARMORED CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 778 (1967) 386 U.S. 778ARMORED CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1011.
Decided May 8, 1967.
260 F. Supp. 612, affirmed.
J. Kevin Murphy for appellant.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Seymour D. Lewis for B. D.C. Corp., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1011.
Decided May 8, 1967.
260 F. Supp. 612, affirmed. J. Kevin Murphy for appellant. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Seymour D. Lewis for B. D.C. Corp., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
ARMORED CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 386 U.S. 778 (1967) 386 U.S. 778 ARMORED CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1011.
Decided May 8, 1967.
260 F. Supp. 612, affirmed. J. Kevin Murphy for appellant. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Seymour D. Lewis for B. D.C. Corp., appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Search This Case
